A Balanced Review of Strengths and Weaknesses of Learning

Review of Learning in the Panic Zone Strategies for Managing Learner disquiet Introduction It is generally agreed that look can be divided from incompatible perspectives, such as macrocosm assort into empirical and philosophical seek fit to whether hive a pore info or non (Allison, 2012). So does friendly question, which features centering on state in a social restoreting (Robson, 2011, p. 5) and aims at achieving interrogation purposes of action, change and emancipation (Robson, 2011, p. 39).In borders of seek paradigms, social explore can be divided into three-figure query and soft look into, usually the former focussing on collecting numerical selective information and the latter focusing on collecting selective information of words (Robson, 2011, p. 5). Thus being aw atomic number 18 of disparate theoretical border ones, enquiryers piddle away up reflexive, creative, and capable of reinvention and evolution (Robson, 2011, p. 41). Also consort to Ro bson, the kind of query refers to applied query projects which ar typically smooth in scale and modest in grasp, is termed as satisfying world investigate (Robson, 2011, p. 3).It usually solves tasks and issues of direct relevance to peoples lives (Robson, 2011, p. 4). And the research to a lower place review, which applies strategies into real programs (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 420), seems to be this kind of research. In this assignment, I am going to evaluate the term chthonian(a) review from the human faces of strengths and weaknesses, and relate the compend to the broader issues of research. Strengths Firstly, to some extent, this oblige is formally lucid and well-organized by using subheadings and questions like How do trainers support learners who under burgeon forth repugn tasks? (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 427). acceptedizing the ranch (Shon, 2012, p. 3) in publications that few charge has been paid to affirmatory effect of s schooling in r eal cases (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 420), the researchers formed their research questions, presented their RAT (Shon, 2012, p. 3) and then came the research purport and research method, multi-strategy heading (Robson, 2011, p. 6) and triangulation (Cohen, 2007, p. 141) respectively. Seen from the perspective of the research design, it is coterminously related to previous literature and theory, and tries to answer research questions by adopting plastered research methods.Finally, with the conclusion indicating that the theoretical strategies argon in accordance with the comfort-stretch-panic model in previous literature and recommending shape up studies (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 435). Secondly, as a social research, it is of great entertain to fork out a scientific military position systematically, sceptically and ethically (Robson, 2011, p. 15). Specifically, by verbalism systematically, I regard as this research is well prepared and arranged by both experience d trainer and consultant, with all over six old age experience of providing consultancy in prepare (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 38) and more than 30 years experience in education and training (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 420) separately. So they both bring in a clear understanding of what, how and why they are doing in the research. They made a minute exposition of literature, including theoretical solutions to debilitating learner anxiety (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 421) and practical mea sure as shootings that a trainer can take to prepare learners for challenging tasks (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 427) and designed the questionnaires in research utilizing the strategies in literature.Such a coherent process of research design is sufficient for the first verbal expression of scientific attitude. And by verbalism sceptically, I mean the researchers afford recognized its limitations of using a small audition of 30 potential participants and the absence seizure of t rainees feedback and on that pointfore recommended future work of forecasting the various(prenominal) personal differences and how these impact divers(prenominal)ial responses to trying situations (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 435), thus subjecting ideas to achievable disconfirmation (Robson, 2011, p. 5). And finally, ethically is equal during the questionnaires, which were sent only to those who indicated availability to suspensor with the research (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 428). The third part of advantages focuses on research method. Combining strategies of eyeshot and interview, it is distinct that this research mainly conducts soft research method. However, it can excessively be calledtriangulation because of the close connection among literature, survey and interviews. jibe to Cohen, triangulation may be defined as the use of 2 or more methods of information prayer in the study of some aspect of human behavior (Cohen, 2007, p. 141). It is often utilize t o mean bringing divergent kinds of curtilage to bear on a problem (Esterberg, 2002, p. 176). Here in the article under review, by showing triangulation, the researchers adopted the approach of triangulating literature, survey and interview. According to different literatures, at that place are many fictitious characters of triangulation and from each one has its bear characteristics, of which theoretical triangulation (Cohen, 2007, p. 42) and methodology triangulation (Cohen, 2007, p. 142) are reflected in this research. According to Cohen, the former draws upon alternative or competing theories in preference to utilizing one pedestal only and the other uses either the self-importancesame(prenominal) method on different occasions, or different methods on the same object of study (Cohen, 2007, p. 142). Sometimes different theories and results from conducting different methods lead to conflict conclusions, it does not mean the research is wrong, it may indicates the necess ary of further study and research in wider field.So by adopting different types of triangulation, researchers feel more positive(p) of their findings and enhance daring (Cohen, 2007, p. 141). Similar with triangulation, there are as well as variable kinds of well-groundedity. The type I will focus on is concurrent validity because it is the type intensify in the article I am evaluating. How does the triangulation ensuring concurrent validity (Cohen, 2007, p. 140) is the main meet of this part. Concurrent validity is a division of criterion-related validity (Cohen, 2007, p. 40), also called criterion validity by Perri and Bellamy, implying whether the measures are in soak up with other measures of the same content that are generally accepted as valid in the wider research community (Perri 6& Bellamy, 2012, p. 92). To demonstrate this form of validity the entropy gathered from using one putz must correlate highly with data gathered from using another promoter (Cohen, 2007, p. 140). To be special, in this article under review, the data is collected both from survey and interview with the guidance of a large-mouthed amount of literature, applying theoretical riangulation and methodology triangulation, thus the concurrent validity is relatively check offd. As Lancy indicates, using multiple data ascendants also allows one to fill in gaps that would pass along if we relied on only one source (Lancy, 1993, p. 20). Last but not the least, the research draws on the advantages of its research designs. According to Robson, social research design can be separated into fit(p) design and malleable design (Robson, 2011, p. 5). And the key to distinguish these two designs is whether the procedure and focus of research is fixed or not (Robson, 2011, p. ). However, it should be observe that there overlaps between them. For example, one specific fixed-designed research could be flexible influenced by soft data. So for those using both qualitative and quantit ative data, there arise multi-strategy designs (Robson, 2011, p. 6). Here by saying multi-strategy, which has unassailable collection of both qualitative and quantitative data in different phases or aspects of the same project (Robson, 2011, p. 6), I do not mean that it contradicts the qualitative research method.It means a research design of combining qualitative and quantitative elements when conducting the qualitative research method. In a press sense, the method utilise in this article should not be called as multi-strategy because the qualitative elements account for a larger proportion. However, the researchers take advantages of using both elements. For example, though there is tendency for people to over-choose the middle pickax (Thomas, 2011, p. 178), the quantitative approach of five-point Likert scale (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 29) does admirer the researchers from the trouble of getting specific data from the abstract description. And for the analysis, evaluati on and interpretation of data and sample, this paper uses descriptive statistics (methods used to total or describe our observations) (Rowntree, 2000, p. 19) to summarize the sample of research and indicates that future study is unavoidable for inferential statistics, which is concerned with generalizing from a sample, to make estimates and inferences or so a wider population (Rowntree, 2000, p. 1). By using opportunistic purposive sampling, the researchers regarded respondents as object lessons of a various(a) convention of trainers from across the UK with male and effeminate trainers antiquated between 26-55 years (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 428), one tycoon hold the opinion that using mechanically skillful methods (Rowntree, 2000, p. 24) of selecting stochasticly is a safe way to make a un aslant representative sample, however, it is conceivable that you could use random methods and even so end up with a biased sample (Rowntree, 2000, p. 25).So considering the ric h experience of the researchers, the opportunistic purposive sampling is a conk out choice to avoid the less representativeness of random sampling. Weaknesses However, there are some reservations. Firstly, when analyzing the potential of different strategies, it seems that the researchers hurt not purview about control variable. According to David and Sutton, control variable means a variable that influences the relationship between the strong-minded and dependent variables (David & Sutton, 2011, p. 11). Though it is a term in mathematical notation, I would conjure up using it and adopting control groups in each training program. Otherwise the variables such as the difference of trainees, trainers and training environment among different programs might influence the validity of data. perchance this limitation is terrible for researchers to avoid because of the incident that the training is not conducted by the researchers themselves. The data are indirectly collected as com ments/feedbacks from different trainers.Thus to some extent, it is really hard to make sure the validity of data in this research since there are so many variables. Moreover, even after(prenominal) adopting control groups and comparing data from some(prenominal) groups in one particular training program, the validity of data is easily to be influenced by uncontrollable variables. Taking interviews for example, uncontrollable variables could be characteristics of the interviewers, interactions of interviewer/respondent characteristics and privacy concerns of the respondents (Robson, 2011, p. 241).Although the researchers cast off tried to do the best by adopting semi- organize interview (Thomas, 2011, p. 164), indicating that 11 respondents were interviewed in a guided unstructured format in which participants were allowed a considerable degree of analog to express their opinions within the interview textile (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 429), they have not excluded the influ ence of the manikin. So it is rather difficult for the researchers to ensure the validity of data and to precisely touch the research purpose.And another influence about the validity the researchers might not consider well is the representativeness of the sample. Considering that the research mainly focus on questionnaire-based surveys (Internet surveys and interview surveys specifically) (Robson, 2011, p. 240), which ignores the characteristics of non-respondents (Robson, 2011, p. 240), it is doubtable to say that the sample of respondents is representative (Robson, 2011, p. 240).Maybe it is more glib-tongued to say that our statistical methodology enables us to collect samples that are likely to be as representative as possible (Rowntree, 2000, p. 23) rather than the respondents represented a diverse group of trainers from across the UK with male and female trainers aged between 26-55 years (Palethorpe & Wilson, 2011, p. 428). shutting To sum up, this assignment evaluates the s trengths and weaknesses of the article under review in the framework of different methodology and methods.Within the article, by comparing the positive aspects and problematic areas, it is relatively persuasive for the authors to birdcall their findings. And the contributions they made by putting the theories into normal are highly appreciated since it is a real world research. References 1. Allison, P. (2012). The source of experience Course understructure Vedio. United dry land The University of Edinburgh. 2. Cohen, L. , Manion, L. , & Morrison, K. (2007). question methods in education. (6th ed. ). London & unseasoned York Routledge. 3.David, M. , & Sutton, C. D. (2011). Social research An Introduction. (2nd ed. ). New Delhi SAGE. 4. Esterberg, K. G. (2002). qualitative methods in social research. United States The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 5. Lancy, D. F. (1993). soft research in education An noesisableness to the major tradition. New York Longman. 6. Palethorpe, R. , & Wilson, J. P. (2011). Learning in the panic zone Strategies for managing learner anxiety. ledger of European Industrial Training, 35(5), 420-438. 7. Perri 6, & Bellamy, C. (2012).Principles of methodology Research design in social science. Croydon SAGE. 8. Robson, C. (2011). Real world research. (3rd ed. ). Cornwall John Wiley&Sons Ltd. 9. Rowntree, D. (2000). Statistics without tears An introduction for non-mathematicians. London Penguin Group. 10. Shon, P. C. H. (2012). How to read journal articles in the social sciences. London SAGE. 11. Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your research project. London SAGE. Self Assessment scroll When you submit your assignment for this course you also need to acknowledge a self assessment document.This is a student rendering of the mark sheet and must include at least one convict under each of the headings. Do not suggest a grade for your assignment POSTGRADUATE ASSIGNMENT SELF estimation DOCUMENT Course title The sources of knowledge Year 20 12 Matriculation number s1262299 1. experience and Understanding of Concepts Has the student unders withald the methodological concepts used (or not) by the authors in the paper? Yes, I understand the methodological concepts used by the authors in the paper under review by evaluating it from different perspectives in a balanced view. . Knowledge and employ of the Literature Has the student shown evidence of version core and ancillary texts? Yes, I have shown evidence of reading core and supplementary texts by citing their opinion. 3. Critical Reflection on Theory and Practice Has the student explained and critically evaluated the pros and cons of the methodology (theory) and methods (practice) the papers analysed? Yes, I have explained and evaluated the pros and cons of the methodology and methods the paper analysed in a balanced view.And I have tried to judge on the basis of what the authors set out to achieve and consider the pose they have, thus not being too critical. 4 . Constructing Academic Discourse Has the student structured the assignment effectively, adopted an appropriately academician style and tone? Spelling? phraseology? Grammar? Format? Fluency? Yes, I have structured my assignment effectively and adopted an appropriately academic style and tone. I have checked it to make sure of the correctness of the spelling, vocabulary, grammar, format and fluency. All of the supra four areas receive equal weightiness