Abortion pro life vs pro choice

Abortion pro life vs pro pickaxPro-life vs. pro-choice is a nasty debate that doesnt seem to have manyanswers. There are many questions and f conducts to back up both sides of theargument. Some people aver stillbirth is a womens rights issue. Other peoplesay its an issue of morality, and still others an issue of just being right.The issue of abortion rights is an opinionated controersy in public life. Everyperson has an opinion about abortion rights, and it seems that a moral objectivehas become divided into two different arenas-social issues vs. religious issues,with the church service and the politicians in the direct line of fire.On one side of the abortion rights debate are the pro-life proponents. In theUnited States, the position of most Christian churches is that the perform hassomething to say about public life and the good society. The primaryinvolvement of the U.S. Catholic bishops in public life in the last ten focusedon abortion.The movement is non flexible, and while the movement recognizes that somewomen might not be ready to become mothers, pro-life encourageers offer womena chance to give up their babies or offer support services. The pro-life movementis simple abortion is murder and murder is bad. Pro-lifers measure life asbeginning at the moment of conception. Anything which may disrupt apregnancy (including birth enclose) is treat.On the surface, the pro-life movement seems to impact the reproductive rightsof women-because it does. While roe vs. Wade 1973 allows women the rightto choose to have elective abortions, pro-life supporters believe that the lawabortion 3should stop this from happening. Pro-lifers believe that all abortions are wrongand that every baby should have a chance to be born.The pro-life movement gave rise in the sixties. The proponents maintain thatthe fetus is alive and human being. They believe that the unhatched fetus is a person andphysically independent, and as a person, the fetus has human rights. Pro-l ifebelievers agree that killing an unborn fetus is murder.There appears to be a competition between the U.S. Catholic and Americanpolitics. The bishops describe abortion and euthanasia as pre-eminent panicsto human dignity because they directly attack life itself. The bishops introduce thatkilling an unborn kidskin is evil and to make such an evil action legal is wrong.Their opposition to legal abortion is the primary social issue.The church services command that direct abortion is morally wrong has become atradition in the Church itself-the Church teaches that abortion is not only morallywrong, it is murder. Pro-lifers make out for the rights of unborn fetuses. Catholicmoral teaching is based on the dignity of the human person, and the principlesbased on this foundation of human dignity apply across the board to all lifeissues. Abortion is now the native human rights issue of today.The outcome of the debate between pro-choice and pro-life opponents needsto be politically co rrect and morally right. Pro-life and pro-choice are terms ofpolitical framing. The Catholic Church does not give women a personal choice inthe abortion issue. Abortion is murder and pro-life is anti-abortion. The endabortion 4result could possibly be that the U.S. bishops and the American politicians go outboth bring home the bacon their side of the controversy at hand the social issue and the religiousissue of abortion rights leave behind not be morally right, and abortion will not be legal.In the argument for pro-choice, those who want women to have the choicewhether or not to have an abortion, the debate does not discuss whether lifebegins at fertilization. The argument in pro-choice is not necessarily that allwomen should HAVE abortions, but that women should have the CHOICEwhether or not to have one. Pro-choice is a middle ground anti-choice is forcedmotherhood. Pro-choice supporters believe abortion should be settled privatelybetween a woman and her doctor.Pro-choice is no t pro-abortion. Supporters acknowledge those who are personallyagainst abortion, but who do not impose their viewpoint on all women. Thepro-choice movement does not advocate abortion over birth-it simply defendsthe right of women to decide for themselves.The pro-choice believers support and work towards preventing unwantedpregnancies, reducing abortion, promoting contraception, educating women andyouth, and ensuring that families have the necessary resources to raise healthyhappy children. Abortion clinics and hospitals come in proper protocol for abortion.These clinics must provide full declareation on the risks and side effects andprocedures. They must allow a woman to view the embryo, inform her if thereare twins, and provide fetal development photos. All women are counseled onbirth control, and pleaders offer non-judgmental options to the women.abortion 5Most women have already made up their minds to have abortions when theyvisit an abortion clinic, yet 1 to 5% change their m inds after counseling.Clinic counselors clear up womens anxieties and fears about abortion. Anabortion clinic counselor saves far more unborn babies in a year than ananti-abortion picketer saves in a lifetime.The pro-choice movement and abortion providers are in the business of defend and respecting womens rights, their moral autonomy, and theirchoices. They want every woman to be willing and every child to be wanted.Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-family, and pro-life in the true sense of that term.The movement struggles just in efforts to decrease the need for abortions.Anti-choice opposes contraception and sexual education-a possible return toillegal unsafe abortions. Legal safe abortion is a issuing of fundamental rightsfor women BECAUSE LAWS AGAINST ABORTION DONT STOP ABORTION.Pro-choice supporters do not want to debate with those who wish to strip womenof their rights.In my opinion, the moral issue has been transferred from Church to state.Pro-life is a struggle between what is po litically correct and morality. Both thepro-life and pro-choice movements have become a moral and political debatebetween the Church and the lawmakers and work toward their own desires andgoals.The Catholic Church says that killing an unborn child is evil and to make suchabortion 6an action legal is wrong. The Church interprets abortion as killing and teachesthat killing is a mortal sin. I question where the interpretation comes from theBible? The Ten Commandments? The Vatican? The Church thinks thatabortion is a threat to human dignity because it directly attacks life itself. Themoral issue of abortion becomes a social issue because of the Churchsopposition to legal abortion. They are saying that the act of making an abortionlegal is wrong. Its almost like blaming the lawmakers for the sin of abortion.Then, they want the law to enforce their teachings.The abortion issue is not whether a woman is committing a sin by having anabortion, its who is legally responsible for her decision and the outcome. Awoman should have the rightful freedom to believe what she wants to believe,and her sin (if it is a sin), is between her and God-not the Church, and not thelaw. The Church does not give women a personal choice in the abortion choice,therefore, they are taking away their fundamental human rights.I am not going to debate whether pro-life issues are correct or false, butrather, try to understand what pro-life is, what it means, and why its still beingargued as the right way. On the other hand, the pro-choice movement is anethical view that women should have the choice to continue or terminate apregnancy. If abortion is not legal, women will return to illegal unsafe abortions.I believer that a woman should have the RIGHT to choose what to do with herbody, and at the same time, I support the teachings of the Catholic Church thatabortion is morally wrong. Abortion is a moral choice for any woman wishing toabortion 7control her body-and this should be a certain unalienabl e right.If I were attempting to exercise my right of choice to have or not have anabortion, I would need to occupy myself the following questions-Is the fetus alive? Of course. Its a biological mechanism-a genesis ofnew life. But it does not have human rights-including the right to beaborted during its gestation.-Is it human? Yes-a human being in an early stage of development-notwith full human rights.-Is it a person? No-just a potential person.-Is it physically independent? No-absolutely dependent on other humanbeing for its continued existence.-Does it have human rights? Yes and no. Not before birth.-Is abortion murder? No-its not an independent person.While I support the teachings of the Church, I believe that a women shouldhave the right to choose what to do with her body. The pro-choice movementwants every woman to be willing and every child to be wanted. Pro-woman,pro-child, pro-family, and pro-life in the true sense of that term. No one has theright answer, but no one has t he wrong answer either. Although the woman invariably has the right to choose, the pro-life movement makes some good pointsany scared and single mother might want to consider.As for my feelings, I believe that abortion is a private issue-an issue thatabortion 8should be between a woman and God. I believe the Churchs teaching that Godgave me free will to make my own decisions. I think that the pro-choicemovement struggles alone in its efforts to decrease the need for abortion. Legalsafe abortion is a matter of fundamental rights for women because LAWSAGAINST ABORTION DONT STOP ABORTION. Pro-life vs. pro-choice is avicious debate that doesnt seem to have many answers. Some people sayabortion is a womens rights issue. Other people say its an issue of morality,and still other an issue of just being right.abortion 9